<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Super Tuesday Poll &#8211; Wireless IDS/IPS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wifijedi.com/2009/04/21/super-tuesday-poll-wireless-idsips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wifijedi.com/2009/04/21/super-tuesday-poll-wireless-idsips/</link>
	<description>World's Greatest Wireless Networking &#38; Security Blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:40:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://wifijedi.com/2009/04/21/super-tuesday-poll-wireless-idsips/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 05:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wifijedi.com/?p=820#comment-241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great, the new poll is already out clarifying the above point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, the new poll is already out clarifying the above point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://wifijedi.com/2009/04/21/super-tuesday-poll-wireless-idsips/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 05:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wifijedi.com/?p=820#comment-240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is indeed interesting poll. The way &quot;integrated&quot; IDS/IPS has been defined for this poll, one thing remains unclear is whether those who are using integrated IDS/IPS have any radios on APs dedicated to threat monitoring or all are shared between traffic forwarding and threat monitoring. Could be the question for next poll.

See related post on overlay and integrated IDS/IPS jargon at:

http://blog.airtightnetworks.com/clarifying-the-widswips-jargon-overlay-integrated-etc/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is indeed interesting poll. The way &#8220;integrated&#8221; IDS/IPS has been defined for this poll, one thing remains unclear is whether those who are using integrated IDS/IPS have any radios on APs dedicated to threat monitoring or all are shared between traffic forwarding and threat monitoring. Could be the question for next poll.</p>
<p>See related post on overlay and integrated IDS/IPS jargon at:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.airtightnetworks.com/clarifying-the-widswips-jargon-overlay-integrated-etc/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.airtightnetworks.com/clarifying-the-widswips-jargon-overlay-integrated-etc/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

